Putin drew the attention of the Human Rights Committee’s critics, adding that those who supported the war


Something is loading.

Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed on the go.

President Vladimir Putin on Thursday removed several critics from Russia’s Human Rights Council, replacing them with some pro-Kremlin and pro-war figures, independent Russian media reported.

An official decree from the Council removed 10 names, including internationally respected figures such as xenophobia researcher Alexander Verkhovsky and anti-torture activist Igor Kalyapin.

In their place, the new council members include Alexander Kots, a war correspondent for the Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, who was sanctioned by Britain as a propagandist, and Elena Shishkina, a representative of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, which is not recognized by the West.

The changes signal a change in the way Putin deals with dissent as his invasion of Ukraine winds down.

Back in March, in the early days of the war, 13 members of the Council signed a declaration calling on Putin to stop hostilities in Ukraine, according to the independent Russian newspaper Meduza.

Dr Precious Chatterje-Doody, a lecturer in politics and international studies focusing on Russia at the UK’s Open University, told Insider: “Putin wants to make sure the council gets the message across” for its annual meeting, set for December 10.

One of those removed, journalist Nikolay Svanidze, wanted to increase the pressure of Russia on the anti-war speech at the meeting, according to Meduza.

Chatterje-Doody said that until the invasion of Ukraine, a ‘safe’ level of political dissent was folded into the Russian political system “as long as it does not directly affect the image or credibility of the Kremlin or Putin himself”.

This system – often called controlled opposition – is what Chatterje-Doody said has allowed organizations like the Human Rights Council to voice genuine criticism.

“But the context of the war changed all that,” she said. “All avenues for dissent in Russia are closing dramatically, and replacing critical voices with war cheerleaders is a continuation of that.”

On October 7, Russia rejected a draft UN Human Rights Council resolution condemning what the body called “a significant deterioration in the human rights situation in the Russian Federation.”

Senior Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday that membership rotations in the Human Rights Council are normal.

Peskov added that with the changes, “other people become leaders of public opinion, and in new circumstances, other people can represent civil society in the best way, they are the most correct reflection of civil society”, the state news agency RIA Novosti reported. .

What is the Russian land next to Poland?

Article IV, Section 1: Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State. See the article : NFL Owner Dan Snyder Says He’s Dirty Enough On Another Guy To ‘Blow Up’ The Entire League. And Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, as well as their effect. US Const.

Kaliningrad is an exclave of Russia – a part of the territory of one country that is completely surrounded by other countries. It belongs to the southern coast of the Baltic Sea and is squeezed between Lithuania and Poland.

Why does Russia still have Kaliningrad? Kaliningrad is part of Russia today due to the ruthlessness of Joseph Stalin, who saw an opportunity to punish Germany for its crimes during World War II and gain a valuable port at the same time. The Soviet prime minister turned the German city into a Russian one, and it has remained so to this day.

What part of Russia is next to Poland?

Is Kaliningrad still part of Russia? Kaliningrad, former German (1255â1946) Königsberg, Polish Królewiec, city, seaport and administrative center of Kaliningrad Oblast (region), Russia. Separated from the rest of the country, the city is an exclave of the Russian Federation.
Kaliningrad ÐалинингÑадCountry
RussiaFederal entity
Kaliningrad RegionEstablished
September 1, 1255


To see also :
There are certain videos on the Internet that are both entertaining and…

Can NATO intervene in a war?

Why is Kaliningrad part of Russia? Kaliningrad used to be called Königsberg, which was a very important German city, and it was returned to the Soviet Union at the end of World War II, at the Potsdam Conference. On the same subject : Eagles sign WR Keric Wheatfall. So the Soviet Union administered it and named it Kaliningrad in 1946, so it was actually just part of the Soviet Union.

According to the current NATO treaty, if a conflict occurs within the North Atlantic region, NATO will intervene for collective self-defense (North Atlantic Treaty Organization 2012).

What does NATO do for war? NATO actions are defensive, designed not to provoke conflict, but to prevent conflict. The Alliance has a responsibility to ensure that this war does not escalate and spread beyond Ukraine, which would be even more devastating and dangerous.

When can NATO intervene? Article 5 provides that if a NATO ally is the victim of an armed attack, each other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the attacked ally.

Has NATO ever been involved in a war?

Can NATO take military action? It says each NATO member must take “such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic region. On the same subject : Meet the 2016 Falcons Cheerleaders.” It also authorizes the alliance to launch an armed response, but the wording is broad and leaves room for other types of action.

In addition to efforts in Afghanistan, NATO has participated in a wide range of roles, including relief efforts, counter-piracy, aggressive enforcement of no-fly zones, and aggressive naval blockades.

When was the last time NATO was used? It was invoked only once in NATO history, after the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. The invocation was confirmed on October 4, 2001, when NATO determined that the attacks were indeed acceptable under the terms of the North Atlantic Treaty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *